Best budget triathlon wetsuits for men and women
Your first triathlon wetsuit is a landmark purchase on your triathlon journey. So which is the sub-£250 winner? 220 finds out...
Your first triathlon wetsuit purchase is one of the most crucial you’ll ever make, the start of a multisport journey that could last a lifetime.
But that’s not to say that the entry-level suits here are just for beginners, as many display enough quality for a host of triathlon experiences.
What they are, however, are top budget triathlon wetsuits on the market, from £100 up to £300, for men and women (if price isn’t an issue for you, take a look at our unrestricted list of the best triathlon wetsuits).
When it comes to buying your triathlon wetsuit, our mantra is repeatedly ‘try before you buy’, as the sizes can vary massively between brands, and it’s paramount your wetsuit fits you properly.
If you can, find a triathlon retailer or triathlon expo to try the suits, especially if this is your first triathlon wetsuit purchase. If not, ensure any online seller has a decent returns policy and study the size guide.
Also, think about your own swim ability when picking as some features – slender neoprene and a reduction in buoyancy – are lost on, or even detrimental to, beginner swimmers.
Those with sinking legs should look for increased neoprene thickness with enhanced buoyancy. And consider which races (sprint or Ironman?!) you’ll be entering and whether you suffer from the cold.
Former 220 features editor and regular kit-tester, Matt Baird takes on the men’s suits, and will provide a close examination of buoyancy for sinking bodies, comfort and fit, plus added technologies. Value and beginner benefits were other key considerations.
In the women’s best cheap triathlon wetsuits, 220 Triathlon editor Helen Webster and former staff writer Kate Milsom look at value for money, buoyancy levels and additional features for athletes either new to triathlon and/or on a budget.
Where to buy cheap triathlon wetsuits
Take a look at the reviews below for our top picks. You’ll also find great deals shared alongside many of the reviews, but you can also regularly find good offers from the following websites:
Top women’s cheap triathlon wetsuits
Orca Athlex Float
220 Triathlon verdict
The extra buoyancy will give reassurance to sinky swimmers and we were bowled over by the quality to RRP. Score 92%
Pros
- Flexible fabrics impressive at this price
- Helpful buoyancy
- Excellent value for money
Cons
- Hard to think of any
- £239 / $349
The triathlon range from Spanish brand Orca remains unchanged for 2024, which is no bad thing as I’ve long turned to them for racing.
Combining supple, flexible fabrics with the perfect fit on this tester, I’m always amazed by the price point on the entry-level models.
The Athlex Float tested here is the entry-level suit with buoyancy (hence ‘Float’) and, while I wouldn’t usually choose a buoyant suit, I was pleasantly surprised by how easy it was to swim in without feeling like my body position was compromised or movement restricted.
This suit features 4.5mm neoprene in the legs and core panel to create that lift, but it still retains a good degree of flexibility, which likely aids that freedom of movement, alongside the highly elastic Infinity Skin 2 lining. All-in-all, this is a superb suit for the money.
Zone3 Aspect Breaststroke Wetsuit
220 Triathlon verdict
Technical given the price and fit for purpose, but sizing could be improved. Score: 90%
Pros
- Unique construction makes it good for breaststroke
- Feels like a second skin
Cons
- Not the warmest
- Tricky to get on
- £179 / $265
The Aspect is unique in this test as it’s designed for breaststroke. As such, it has reduced buoyancy and increased flexibility to allow breaststroke kicking, but there’s nothing to stop you swimming front crawl in it, either.
Buoyancy in most swimming wetsuits disrupts the normal breaststroke body position. The Aspect addresses this by using thinner SCS and smoothskin neoprene along with high-stretch nylon panels.
It wasn’t easy for this tester to get on and is quite tight, so you may want to consider sizing up. Otherwise, it acts like a second skin and feels very technical.
The thickness is reduced to 2mm on the calves, inner thighs, arms and shoulders.
The thickest areas are the front torso and rear legs, but this overall thin feel means the suit isn’t as warm as others. It only goes up to a UK size 16, too.
See our full Zone3 Aspect Breaststroke review for more.
Raceskin RS01
220 Triathlon verdict
Decent suit for the money with plenty of buoyancy. Looks a little basic in design, though, and zip is a faff! Score: 78%
Pros
- Buoyancy will help weaker swimmers
- Flexible arms
Cons
- Zip is a bit fiddly
- Not one for breaststroke
- £240 (UK only)
This was the first time I’ve tried a Raceskin wetsuit and initially I was a bit concerned about the 5mm buoyancy panels and seemingly quite small size (my large didn’t look very large!).
However, once I’d squeezed into it I was pleasantly surprised by how well this suit performed in the water.
I didn’t have any ingress and although it was probably a little too buoyant for me, the thick panel through the legs and core will really help weaker swimmers achieve a better body position.
The arms were relatively flexible at 1.5mm, too.
Raceskin says this suit allows ‘flexibility for every stroke’, but I definitely wouldn’t attempt breaststroke in it.
The zip, unusually for an entry-level test, is open at the bottom (so done up like a zipped jacket), which is a bit of a faff but allows a bit more wriggle room.
Van Rysel Women’s SD Neoprene
220 Triathlon verdict
Great budget pick for shorter distances, and it’s highly flexible in the water. Score: 79%
Pros
- Super flexible
- Easy to get on and off
Cons
- Not much buoyancy
- £119.99
The Van Rysel Short Distance (SD) wetsuit is Decathlon’s answer to entry-level short-course racing. The suit is for those who are new to triathlon and are looking to take on short-distance events (up to 750m).
The predominant use of jersey neoprene, with front and back Glideskin panels, aims to boost the material’s durability, but this does come with the caveat of making it a less buoyant suit that won’t be first choice for heavy-legged swimmers or colder temperatures.
We expected more lift for a wetsuit aimed at beginners, but the jersey does make the SD one of the most flexible suits on test, with no restriction felt across the arms, back, or low-cut neckline.
Like the Yonda, you can switch up your stroke with ease with the flexible design, whether it’s smooth breaststroke or front crawl. The bevelled ankle cut spells swift T1 changing, too.
Zone3 Advance
220 Triathlon verdict
A comfy and stylish suit with adequate buoyancy, but a little short on the legs. Score: 86%
Pros
- Quick to take off
- Solid buoyancy profile
Cons
- Some water ingress
- Cut a little short for colder swims
- $425 / £249
The latest version of the Advance is claimed to be 16% lighter and more buoyant than its predecessor.
The 4mm buoyancy panels along the legs certainly helped our form in the water and we had a decent range of movement in the arms.
We like the stylish design with reflective detailing, while the wide silicone arm and leg cuffs made the suit the fastest to take off on test.
It ticks the sustainability box, too, being made from limestone-derived 39-cell Yamamoto neoprene, rather than from petroleum.
There was no chafing, but the neck and legs felt a little short for our cold springtime test waters. Though fast to do up, the zip did allow water ingress, which isn’t ideal in colder temperatures.
Aqua Sphere Pursuit V3
220 Triathlon verdict
With top-quality tech, this is one of the best cheap triathlon wetsuits for entry-level triathletes. Score: 90%
Pros
- Kept us warm in cooler waters
- Helps deliver streamlined position
Cons
- Some water ingress at the zip
- Not as cheap as others
- £264.50
Aqua Sphere’s wetsuits regularly blow us away, and the Pursuit V3 continues to impress.
The recipe is just right with the ‘Aqua Drive’ core panel consisting of 4mm 38-cell Yamamoto neoprene, the 3.5mm legs holding us up just enough for a streamlined position, and the 2mm thickness ‘Bio-Stretch Zone’ across the arms and back allowing for a silky-smooth arm stroke.
There’s no chafing thanks to the Aqua-Flex collar seal, though we did endure some water ingress via the back zip.
It certainly kept us warm for an hour in 10°C waters and was second only to the Zone3 Advance in terms of removal speed.
Admittedly, this suit sits just above our £250 price point for budget suits, but it’s worth the extra.
Raceskin Magna
- £225
The Raceskin’s hydrodynamic SCS-coated suit felt sleek and high quality when on. We found the sizing was on the roomy side, so you may want to study the sizing chart closely before ordering.
Due to a varying neoprene thickness from 1.5mm-5mm across the suit, our legs felt lifted and our arms had adequate range of movement when swimming at a leisurely pace, though the men’s version delivered a limited stroke extension while on test last year.
Thanks to taped and flatlock seams, comfort was an easy win, with our only gripe being the reverse zipper. It seems unnecessary for an entry-level suit, though admittedly does make for easy removal post-swim.
This review is of the 2021 suit, the updated 2022 version does not have a reverse zip.
220 Triathlon verdict
Not the most flattering wetsuit, but comfortable and warm while in the water. Score: 78%
Pros
- Largely comfortable
- Good buoyancy at the legs
Cons
- Reverse zipper not our preferred choice on entry-level suits
2XU Propel P:1
220 Triathlon verdict
A decent suit with lots of flexibility for fast swimming, but sizing could cause issues Score: 80%
Pros
- Very comfortable
- Lots of flexibility in the shoulders
Cons
- Concerns about durability
- Some bunching on the zip
- £250
Sitting at the very top end of our budget price range, first impressions of the Propel were good, helped by its flattering design and sleek fit.
The suit’s ‘rollbar technology’ of graduated 39-cell Yamamoto neoprene allows a variation of buoyancy from a thick 5mm at the core, to a thinner 3mm back and 2mm along the ends of arms, all of which aims to aid a swifter swim rotation and more power-conserving arm stroke.
We’re not sure on the sizing process here, which is based solely on height and weight. Our size small fits well except for a bunching of the zip on the back, which gave water ingress.
The Propel gets top marks for comfort and shoulder flexibility is great, but we were concerned about poking holes in the thin-feeling neoprene.
Blueseventy Sprint
220 Triathlon verdict
Some nice features, but the sprint now feels dated and is the most expensive here. Score: 72%
Pros
- No water ingress
- Good range of movement
Cons
- Underarm panels feel a little basic
- Pricier than some budget rivals
- £230
This Blueseventy staple’s £200-ish price tag puts it at the top of our suits here and savvy swimmers may find the considerably cheaper Orca or Speedo more of a draw.
The Sprint was among the snugger size medium suits on test and, after an hour in the water, we found it pulled our lower back a little, so watch sizing.
Those stretchy blue jersey panels under the arms feel a touch basic compared to the full neoprene construction of others on test but, coupled with thin 1.5mm neoprene on the outer arms, allow a wide range of movement.
You also get stretchy calf panels for quick removal and the 3-4-4mm buoyancy pattern gave us a good body position.
The bottom-up zipper and rolled neck, although bulky and high at the back, prevented water ingress, as did the cuffed sleeves.
Dhb Aeron Ultra
220 Triathlon verdict
A good, solid buy with definite tech for those wanting more buoyancy. Score: 80%
Pros
- Warmer than some other suits
- Flexible up top
Cons
- Tricky to take off
- May be too warm for summer racing
- £250
Starting at just £130, the Dhb in-house triathlon range is good for triathletes on a budget and has seen some good results in the past – this tester last used the brand’s thermal version over the winter.
Here is a slightly more expensive option designed, Dhb tells us, for ‘longer distance swims’ and that translates into the use of aerodome technology in the lower part of the suit, which aids buoyancy while minimising drag in the water.
Coupled with 2mm and 3mm chest and shoulder panels this did feel like quite a thick suit overall, but there was enough flexibility across the stroke to feel like we weren’t too restricted, and it did keep us warm through a chilly April test period.
It was a bit tricky to wriggle in and out of, though, as the lower part of the suit did feel a little rigid for this tester.
Lomo Prime Women’s Wetsuit
220 Triathlon verdict
Warmest suit on test, with inclusive sizing and an accessible price point both real positives. Score: 84%
Pros
- Great price
- Big range of sizes
Cons
- May be too buoyant for some
- Prone to some water ingress
- £120
The Prime stands out in this test thanks to its inclusive sizing range, with additional ‘wide’ options to appeal to a larger variation of body shapes.
The suit is made to provide ‘warmth, flexibility and buoyancy’ and it’s one of the warmest on test. The 4/3/2 buoyancy profile is ideal for sinky-leg swimmers and those looking to save energy.
The 4mm smoothskin neoprene along the legs provides a huge amount of lift, while the 2mm neoprene along the arms allows for plenty of flex during the swim stroke. As with all the suits on test, the YKK zipper is smooth to use and the suit is fairly quick to whip off.
The Prime’s geometry isn’t best-suited for breaststroke swimming, as the back zip and garage ride high and dig into the back of the neck when lifting the head. There is no degeneration along the seams, making up a well-rounded thought-out budget suit.
Top men’s cheap triathlon wetsuits
2XU P:1 Propel
- £250
220 Triathlon verdict
Very hard to fault but not as supple as some with the entry-level price point becoming more competitive. Score: 85%
Pros
- Solid buoyancy
- Durable
Cons
- Minor bit of water ingresss on the neck
- Not as cheap as other budget suits
The P:1 Propel has been a regular high scorer in our recent entry-level wetsuit tests, with this latest version largely going for the ‘If it ain’t broke’ formula.
Which is largely no bad thing, as the 2XU utilises a combination of classy 39-cell Yamamoto neoprene, an SCS coating and 1.5mm thick panels in the upper body.
And all for an entry to mid-level price point. It’s a noticeably thicker and heavier suit than the dhb Aeron Lab, for example, a mix of 3 and 5mm panels on the upper chest, legs and back giving a hefty dose of buoyancy in the water (more natural swimmers may well say too much).
There was a slither of water ingress aroud the neck, and some swimmers may prefer the visuals of the previous P:1 editions.
That said, we can certainly vouch for the 2XU P:1 Propel’s long-term durability. And this wetsuit’s two-year warranty is definitely another plus point.
Zone3 Agile
220 Triathlon verdict
A solid contender that’ll please both beginners and bank balances. Score: 83%
Pros
- Nice balance between buoyancy and flexibility
- Minimal water ingress
Cons
- Visually not the most exciting
- Little else to fault
- $345 / £199
Zone3’s £250 Advance has long been one of our beginner-friendly picks, but can the new Agile wetsuit undercut its celebrated older and more expensive sibling?
It certainly stands out due to the silver cuffs and back panels, which look a little too 1960s science-fiction for me. And it’s also a solid performer in the water.
The 2mm upper body panels are agile enough, while the 3 and 4mm sections deliver a considered, but not excessive, level of lift.
Yamamoto materials are seemingly absent, but an eco-friendly neoprene is present. And this is coated with a Speedflo technology that beads water to aid hydrodynamics.
With minimal water ingress and secure seams, the Zone3 Agile never failed to keep our tester warm in the English Channel in May. Like the 2XU P:1 Propel, it feels like a durable and tough wetsuit that will last through multiple seasons of use. MB
Yonda Spook
220 Triathlon verdict
Great as an open-water contender, but is tri-friendly too. Score: 85%
Pros
- High-quality construction
- Chafe-free to swim in
Cons
- Suffers some water ingress
- Nylon sections fit looser and absorbs more water than neoprene
- £269
Yonda has fine form on these pages with the Ghost and Spectre triathlon wetsuits. The similarly paranormal-themed Spook is from the British brand’s open-water collection, but there’s little to give you the frights here.
Construction is high quality and the nylon/neoprene combo offers an unrestricted front-crawl stroke due to the smartly placed panels. The only mild chills we did experience came from some water ingress, and from the nylo being looser and more absorbent than neoprene. This means it takes longer to dry and can get heavier.
The classy neck, meanwhile, led to a chafe-free swim. We’re not convinced by the elasticated arm cuffs, which did lead to some water ingress, but the overall comfort and durability heightens the versatility – we’d happily use this on our paddleboard ventures alongside open-water swimming and for triathlon race days. MB
Speedo Proton
220 Triathlon verdict
It may not be new, but it’s still a fine budget suit offering remarkable value. Score: 90%
Pros
- Balanced buoyancy makes it fun to swim in
- Flexible in the shoulders and arms
Cons
- Sizing runs a little small
- May not be enough lift for sinky-legged swimmers
- £140
The Proton has been around a while now, but that’s no bad thing as it’s a winning budget suit.
After our first swim, we had to double check the RRP as we believed it’d be more expensive, but what we actually have is Yamamoto 38-cell neoprene, and a lean, lithe and continuous 1.5mm shoulder panel for an astonishing £140.
Where budget wetsuits are often purely functional – a bludgeon of buoyancy, a flirtation with flexibility – the Proton finds the balance between keeping you afloat and maintaining a feel for the water thanks to the 1.5mm thickness of the shoulders and supple neoprene. And it’s also damn enjoyable to swim in.
Negative points are minimal, although those with sinking legs may want more buoyancy than the max 4mm leg thickness offered here. The neoprene is also quite delicate and we’d size up if you’re between sizes. MB
Van Rysel Men’s Triathlon SD wetsuit
220 Triathlon verdict
A solid entry-level wetsuit, but one that you’ll likely be looking to upgrade quite quickly. Score: 73%
Pros
- Super price
- Very flexible
Cons
- Limited buoyancy
- Not the warmest
- £119.99
We’ve had this Decathlon wetsuit on test in the past (see the the women’s version reviewed above) and the good news is the price has stayed the same, as has the design.
That means there’s still large sections of uncoated neoprene, aside from the chest and front of the thighs, which are coated.
The result is that this wetsuit is less hydrodynamic (hence, slower), less buoyant and not as warm compared to fully coated options.
That lack of warmth and buoyancy may be enough to put you off if your legs sink a lot or you’re not used to cold water, but on the flip side, it’s very flexible and allows you to swim a variety of strokes without contributing to fatigue.
The shorter cut on the legs also helps you whip the wetsuit off in a hurry in T1, though it’s not the closest fitting, so can let water in.
There’s Velcro on the zip pull so you can keep it out of the way while swimming, too. RS
Lomo Prime Men’s Wetsuit
220 Triathlon verdict
Still a well-rounded, affordable option for beginner triathletes, as long as the sizing works for you. Score: 80%
Pros
- Great value
- One of the warmer suits here
Cons
- Noticeable water ingress
- Not the most refined
- £129
We’ve tested the Prime previously and it’s unchanged aside from a price increase of £29, but that’s still great value.
As we’ve noted before, this suit is rather warm, even in 10°C water.
I noticed occasional water ingress around the the neck, while the suit also held a bit of excess water at times, but I think opting for the next size down would have countered that.
I also had bunching of neoprene at the armpits, which has been mentioned by our testers before.
Given that, I’d suggest sizing down if you’re between sizes.
The 2mm neoprene on the arms offered decent flexibility, while the 4mm panels on the front and thighs ensured plenty of buoyancy to help sinky-legged swimmers, but may be too much for those with good technique.
The rear Velcro tab was tough to open and also developed a hole, but this hasn’t been an issue with past samples. RS
Sailfish Atlantic
220 Triathlon verdict
A supple and slick training suit, but not one for race day or the cold. Score: 80%
Pros
- Natural swimming experience
- Quick to swim in for good swimmers
Cons
- Colder than many competitors
- Limited buoyancy won’t suit everyone
- £195
The first rule of Sailfish is to size down, with the brand’s suits regularly coming up bigger than we’d expect.
The second rule of Sailfish is that the suits it makes are always top quality. That continues with the sleek Atlantic, which joins the ever-expanding pool of open-water-specific suits rather than pure tri wetsuits.
This means thinner neoprene and thus less buoyancy, with the thicknesses ranging from 0.5-2mm.
The result is you have to kick your legs far more than a tri wetsuit – good for technique progression, less so for conserving race-day legs for the bike and run.
The benefit is a natural swimming experience, with the nylon/neoprene construction hugely flexible and providing excellent upper-body movement (it was the swiftest in our timed tests too).
Despite that Atlantic title, it’s a suit we’d rather use in the Med, as we noticeably suffered in the cold. MB
Lomo Cyclone
220 Triathlon verdict
An incredibly cheap suit, but the price shows in the erratic performance. Score: 60%
Pros
- Very cheap
- Felt durable
Cons
- Rigid in the arms
- Slow to strip off
- £69
Fifty quid is the cheapest wetsuit we’ve ever tested, but does a rock-bottom price ensure good value? Not in this instance, especially when you compare it to the Aptonia or Lomo’s own Prime wetsuit.
The nylon construction of the arms just felt rigid and swimming was an ongoing wrestle to get the disobedient arms doing what we wanted – forget any talk of this suit acting like a second skin.
The tight elasticated cuffs proved troublesome to get off or pull up, meaning we couldn’t access our sports watch pre or post-swim, and the chunky zipper head gave us serious neck-rubbing issues.
The 3mm all-over thickness felt too little in the legs and overkill in the upper body. In terms of positives, the suit’s flatlock stitching is welcome, it feels durable and looks decent enough, while the water ingress through the zip was limited. MB
Zone3 Advance
220 Triathlon verdict
Efficiently ticks the boxes for entry-level triathletes, but edged here by the 2XU and dhb. Score: 85%
Pros
- Balanced buoyancy
- Speedy to strip off
Cons
- Fit was a little tight on the shoulders
- £249 / $425
The Advance was once this tester’s top entry-level suit recommendation, but it was then superseded by the Orca S7 and 2XU P:1.
The new Advance instantly takes the eco award with its recycled rubber construction, and there’s no pre-swim faff with the standard zipper (unlike Aptonia and Raceskin).
Zone3 doesn’t list the panel thicknesses, but it’s 2mm on the shoulders, a 3/4mm core and 2mm again in the calves. Buoyancy is far from excessive (leg/bottom sinkers may want more) but it’s evenly balanced. There were no neck or water-ingress issues, yet the suit only placed third in our timed speed tests.
While not an exact science, we found it tight around the shoulders (and we’re more Woody Allen than The Rock in shoulder width), which could’ve lessened efficiency. Getting it off is speedy thanks to the Pro Speed Cuffs. MB
2XU Propel P:1
220 Triathlon verdict
Top tech, swift in the water and a decent price tag make this the budget suit to beat. Score: 90%
Pros
- Flexible upper body
- Speedy performance
Cons
- Prone to some water ingress
- £215
2XU has won the lion’s share of Best on Test wetsuit awards for the past few seasons, and the P:1 Propel boasts an impressive feature list for the £215 tag.
There’s a SCS coating, high grade 39-cell Yamomoto neoprene and 1.5mm neoprene in the upper body. Fairly high buoyancy levels are provided by a mix of 3mm and 5mm on the upper chest, legs and back, while 2XU’s ‘rollbar’ tech adds to the controlled body position.
Some water ingress was felt around the neck and along the rear zipper – something that was bearable in 19°C waters, wince-inducing in less (it also trickled into the arms).
Yet this didn’t hugely affect its aquatic chops, as this was the fastest on test loops. We personally prefer the visuals and feel of 2018’s edition of the P:1, but a two-year warranty is another plus. MB
Blu Smooth MK1 Racer
220 Triathlon verdict
Good value and a solid buoyancy profile, but minor chafing issues see this suit lose marks. Score: 78%
Pros
- Superb range of movement
- Quick to remove
Cons
- Some chafing under the arms
- Not one for colder water
- £149
Blu Smooth is a new brand to these pages, but it was founded 11 years ago in South Africa.
The MK1 Racer sleeveless suit on test here uses Jako MSL 25 smoothskin neoprene, which is also new to us, but as it’s limestone-based it’s said to be more eco-friendly than some petroleum-based options.
Its sleeveless nature, and the max thickness of 3mm panels, means this suit is best suited to milder waters.
Despite the modest 3mm thickness, this suit offered decent levels of buoyancy to help with my body position in the water, while the lack of sleeves meant ample flexibility (plus quicker removal).
The suit was largely comfortable and fit well in a large, but I did notice some chafing under the arms after my 1,500m test swims.
The Velcro closure at the rear is quick to release, but there’s no Velcro tab on the zip leash. RS
Dhb Hydron
220 Triathlon verdict
A sequel that easily betters the original and is hard to fault for triathlon beginners. Score: 87%
Pros
- Durable construction
- Balanced buoyancy profile
Cons
- Little to fault
- £130
The Hydron 2.0 is a budget suit that’s very hard to fault. The construction is durable, the fit true to size and the visual design is decent enough.
Into the 36m-deep waters of Vobster Quay in Somerset, and the buoyancy is surprisingly moderate for an entry-level suit thanks to the 3mm thickness on the hips and 2.5mm on the thighs (usually this thickness can be up to 5mm).
We’re a leg sinker but still managed our second fastest lake splits in the Hydron, even if the 2mm back/arms thickness and flexibility understandably felt less flexible than the £215 2XU.
The zip’s a standard bottom-up affair, while removal is swift thanks to the calf panels. Water ingress, meanwhile, was minimal. MB
Alpkit Silvertip
220 Triathlon verdict
An affordable intro to thermal wetsuits, but not for triathlon racing Score: 76%
Pros
- Internal pocket and high-vis detailing
- Solid warmth
Cons
- Water ingress at arm cuffs if worn without gloves
- Neck on the tight side
- £224.99
Designed for cold open-water swims, Alpkit’s Silvertip is the outlier in this test against the tri-specific rivals.
The £224.99 price is among the cheapest thermal wetsuits around and you’ll find this type of liner on Huub’s Aegis Thermal.
It’s not the softest on the skin compared to Blueseventy’s glorious wool thermal liners, for example, but it seems to deliver the heat-retaining goods (albeit in Devonshire waters in May, not Scottish lochs in March).
The arm cuffs are fine if you’re wearing gloves, but there’s just too much water ingress for non-gloved swims. The tight elasticated neck chafes and isn’t one for long-swim comfort, but it does quell the water seeping in.
Upper-body flexibility from the 3mm neoprene is acceptable and buoyancy levels are fairly high. But as an entry-level thermal suit for off-season swimming – with an internal pocket and visibility touches – it has appeal. MB
Dhb Aeron Lab 3.0
220 Triathlon verdict
A supple, stylish and speedy suit that’s also a bargain buy with some great features for the money. Score: 91%
Pros
- Very supple
- Speedy to remove in transition
Cons
- Not the most buoyant
- £350
Following Wiggle’s financial struggles and subsequent acquisition by the Frasers Group, there’s not many sizes left in this dhb suit, but it is available at half price.
Worn back-to-back with the rivals here, it’s easily the supplest suit, the 38- and 39-cell levels of Yamamoto neoprene and a mix of 2, 3 and 4mm panels making this the most graceful in the water.
Further spec highlights come in the form of the SCS coating that beads water and arm cuffs that make for a speedy T1.
Thankfully, dhb is continuing to ditch the reverse zipper in the latest version of its top-of-the-range suit, an issue we had with the 2019 edition, while the broad array of sizes (three alone in medium) is a further boon.
Worth noting for leg sinkers and open-water newcomers is that there’s more buoyancy in the 2XU, Alpkit and Zone3 suits on test, but this is hardly lacking in lower body lift. And it looks great, too. MB
Budget wetsuits can be an affordable way to keep yourself safe while training through the seasons. If you’re looking for more advice before you buy, read our guidance on how to choose a triathlon wetsuit.
How we tested
The cheap triathlon wetsuits featured here have been reviewed by 220 Triathlon‘s expert gear testing team, including the likes of seasoned triathletes Matt Baird, editor Helen Webster and top age-grouper Kate Milsom.
Each wetsuit has been tested over numerous swims, including shorter swims and swims beyond 2km.
When testing, we’ve judged the wetsuits on comfort, range of movement, buoyancy, quality, durability, how quick they are to get on or off, features, warmth and value for money.
A score of 90% and above means we believe that a product is truly class-leading, while 80-90% still represents an impressive product.
Anything wetsuit score between 70-80% is still worth considering, as it will have performed well, but there may be one or two issues.
Scores below 70% mean you should approach the product with caution!