Best cushioned run shoes to buy in 2025
Whether you’re targeting a long-distance race or just want more spring in your step, a set of cushioned run shoes will do the job. We test 10 new pairs
The not-too-distant past saw a clear delineation between race and training run shoes. Race shoes were little more than a stretch of fabric, while off-season shoes were heavy.
Advancements have seen race shoes retain their lithe construction but with less sacrifice to comfort, while off-season shoes have retained cushioning, lost mass and improved flexibility. You only have to look at the weights of some of the shoes on test here to realise that times really have changed.
If you’re taking on a longer race or are simply a runner who’s more comfortable in cushioned shoes, you may not want to switch to racing flats.
Plus with technology in shoes intended for high mileage progressing in recent years, you don’t necessarily need to. If anything, changing your shoes for race day is a recipe for disaster, especially if you’re not used to lower drops.
Of course, for the average age-group athlete, consuming mile after mile in search of faster race performance is their primary remit, meaning every shoe here’s designed with greater cushioning to absorb stresses and reduce injury potential.
That’s the theory. In practice, runners will debate the ideas that ‘high cushioning equals low injury’ and ‘zero drop versus pillowy soles’ endlessly. Yet anecdotally, experienced athletes – especially of a taller, larger disposition – appreciate the dampening of forces rebounding off the pavement.
And if that encourages more off-season run miles, even better. How much is optimum? We’d recommend a mix of long runs and intervals. Aim for double-figure weekly run mileage (not 60 – you work and aren’t solely a runner) but don’t forget a spot of speedwork to remind your neurological system to fire rapidly.
Right, onto the test…
Best cushioned run shoes for men
New Balance Fresh Foam 1080
220 Triathlon verdict
An excellent shoe for racking up easy miles in supreme comfort. Score: 92%
Pros
- Comfortable and reliable, suitable for daily training
- Smooth ride
Cons
- Not the faster shoe out there
- $164.99 / £160
The Fresh Foam 1080 offers plush cushioning and a smooth ride. It responds well to small changes in pace and provides a touch of rebound. However, it doesn’t deliver the same level of propulsion as carbon-plated or more speed-oriented shoes.
With a 34mm heel stack and a 6mm drop, the shoe delivers a neutral ride that feels balanced and smooth. The substantial upper adds to the experience, cradling your foot in a snug, supportive fit.
Read our full review of the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080.
Under Armour Infinite 4
220 Triathlon verdict
Fine shoe, though don’t come here for connectivity. Score: 82%
Pros
- Quality ride
- Comfortable and suited to longer mileage
Cons
- Lack of Bluetooth connectivity
- £115
The fourth edition of the Under Armour Infinite is aimed at neutral runners looking to rack up the mileage. We like the stealth aesthetic, though there are six other colourways available.
The quality of the ride is decent, too, starting off slightly firm but soon softening up, though not so much that you lose that valuable connection with the ground.
Comfort’s great from the get-go thanks to a 3D-moulded sockliner, a breathable and flexible mesh upper, and UA’s trademark HOVR cushioning, which delivers an 8mm drop – that’s pretty standard for a mileage trainer. It comes in at 343g for a UK size 10.5.
All in all, it’s a fine shoe, though fans of previous incarnations will be disappointed that there’s no Bluetooth connectivity allowing you to connect to apps like MapMyRun for a wealth of data analysis
Saucony Tempus
- £165
If you’re looking for vibrancy and svelteness, you’ve come to the right place, as these yellow pumps are the lightest on test at 285g (UK10.5).
It’s marketed as a ‘performance stability trainer’ with gait guidance purportedly delivered by Saucony’s PWRRUN frame. That’s a clunky way of describing its curved shape that not only provides stability but also provides a pretty swift transition from landing to toe-off.
It has an 8mm drop, albeit that’s from a pretty lofty 36.5mm heel and 28.5mm forefoot. Visually, that’s in Hoka territory but, like Hoka, that bulky aesthetic doesn’t come at the cost of a tactile ride.
Grip proved impressive in a particularly wet test period, though the highly breathable upper suffered somewhat in the same conditions.
Still, that shouldn’t put you off as modern-day breathability does come at the slight expense of the occasional wet-footed run.
220 Triathlon Verdict
Not cheap, but this is one impressive mileage shoe. Score: 89%
Pros
- Great for mileage
- Good stability
Cons
- Not very water-proof
Asics Kayano 29
220 Triathlon verdict
30 years since its first model, the Kayano continues to appeal. Score: 83%
Pros
- Comfortable and breathable
- Light for a cushioned shoe
Cons
- High drop may not appeal to some runners
- £175
The Kayano is on the verge of its 30th chapter, one that started back in 1993, and, to celebrate, this latest version comes in at a mighty £175. That’s a hefty outlay, though history shows that price doesn’t always deter triathletes and runners.
It weighs 350g (UK10.5), which makes this the lightest Kayano ever. That said, it’s still packed with myriad technologies for mileage munching.
These include Asics’ FF Blast Plus cushioning, which is incredibly comfortable; a new to Kayano Litetruss construction that aids stability and guides the foot on toe-off; and a cosy stretch-knit upper that, again, is comfortable and breathes well.
Drop is relatively large at 10mm and, to this tester at least, who generally prefers a more minimalist shoe, it does feel a touch cumbersome, certainly on faster runs. That said, we know many triathletes who’d love it for that cradling comfort.
On Cloudstratus
220 Triathlon verdict
Another solid effort from On, but we’re unconvinced by the lacing. Score: 80%
Pros
Cons
- £160
First up, let’s look at the star-lacing system found on this stability trainer from On. It’s said to provide added security, but in practice it didn’t feel any different than a traditional system and felt a touch gimmicky. We’re not sure about its looks, either.
On the positive, its almost-corrugated Cloudtec outsole delivers a firm ride that, similar to the Under Armours, soon softens through use. But not so much that it dents that tangible feeling of projecting forward at pace.
Uniquely, the Cloudstratus uses not one but two layers of its Helion foam for increased comfort and energy rebound. In truth, this wasn’t perceptible over previous efforts, arguably because that outsole design is so dominant.
At 332g (UK10.5), it’s on standard footing when it comes to high-mileage weight, while its drop is only 6mm, which does assist on faster off-season efforts.
361° Spire 5
220 Triathlon verdict
No more carbon plate makes the Spire 5 this brand’s finest effort to date. Score: 85%
Pros
- Breathable with good flexibility
Cons
- Lacks stability
- £139.99
361° has given the neutral Spire quite an overhaul, the major change being the dropping of the carbon-fibre plate that was embedded in the midfoot shank. This certainly adds to the shoe’s flexibility, which is particularly noticeable on toe-off.
It retains the full-length layer of Quikspring+ foam, but beneath it now sits ‘highrebound Quikflame technology’. This is potentially a game-changer for 361° as it provides a much comfier, bouncier stride than firmer versions of old.
Meanwhile, the upper’s a breathable knit fabric and keeps things nice and cool.
It comes in at 336g (UK10.5) and features a 9mm drop from a 29mm heel and 20mm forefoot, which makes it fine for long runs and reasonable intensity efforts, but it’s not one for all-out bursts. It also lacks guidance for those who struggle with stability.
Overall, though, this is arguably the finest 361° shoe we’ve tested.
Best cushioned run shoes for women
Brooks Ghost 2 Max
220 Triathlon verdict
Reliable, robust shoe that can do wonders for your general road running . Score: 95%
Pros
- Reliable, comfortable everyday shoe
- Ideal for runners who prefer more cushioning
Cons
- On the heavy side
- Structured upper made feet a little toasty
- $149.95/£145
If cushioning is what you’re after, this shoe delivers it in abundance without the clunky feel often associated with similar models. The outsole provides reliable grip on both wet and dry road surfaces.
Additionally, it’s great to see the Ghost 2 Max incorporating recycled materials, aligning with the industry’s move toward sustainability. See our round-up of the best sustainable running shoes.
Read our full review of the Brooks Ghost 2 Max.
Asics Gel-Nimbus 26
220 Triathlon verdict
A good, robust shoe for easy road miles offering max cushioning and stability at a price. Score: 85%
Pros
- Good traction and stability
- Comfortable and true to size
Cons
- On the heavy side
- $160 / £180
The Gel-Nimbus 26 builds on the performance updates introduced in its predecessor, the Gel-Nimbus 25, focusing on refined tweaks to cushioning materials, the outsole, and lacing system.
Featuring 41mm of cushioning at the heel and 33mm at the midsole, this shoe falls firmly into the max-cushion category for road running. It also boasts the thickest sole among the women’s models tested. Interestingly, the 41mm heel height exceeds World Athletics’ racing limit by just one millimetre too.
Read our full review of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 26.
Hoka Clifton 9
220 Triathlon verdict
A lightweight, high-performing cushioned running shoe. Score: 93%
Pros
- Highly cushioned and comfortable fit
- Light and bouncy
Cons
- None to add!
- £130
The Clifton 9s slip on like a glove – to the point where you can almost forget you’re wearing them.
Hoka has added 3mm in stack height to this new model, bringing the heel to 29mm, but that said, they have somehow made them even lighter at 205g (UK7.5).
Even with this extra cushioning they still have good rebound propelling you forward, making them really well balanced.
They have a lower heel drop of 5mm but have a good rocker through the midfoot helping propel you forward.
The Cliftons easily handled some mid-distance, eight-mile runs during our test period, but would easily handle longer distance. We found the fit just about right, but size up if you aren’t sure.
The upper mesh material is really soft, giving them a comfy fit and, although Hoka has both increased cushioning and made them lighter, it doesn’t feel like they’ve cut back anywhere.
New Balance Fresh Foam X More V 4
220 Triathlon verdict
A super squishy and stable ride for steady runs. Score: 84%
Pros
- Lightweight and cushioned
- Smooth ride
Cons
- Not as responsive as some shoes
- £140
New Balance has packed their Fresh Foam X into these trainers with a higher heel stack than they’ve ever used before, at roughly 34mm.
They have a rocker shape and good flex to help them deliver a really soft and smooth ride. The shoes also have a wide base, which did make our feet feel a bit bigger, but despite all the foam they’re still lightweight at 237g (UK7.5).
The lining was the softest of all the trainers and our feet just slipped into them, while the upper mesh material hugged our feet but was also breathable. The shoe did sit a little higher around the ankles but we didn’t notice any rubbing or pressure points.
They aren’t as responsive as the rest, but all the foam made for a really squishy and stable ride. If you want maximum foam and comfort for some steady runs, then these are a great shoe. Plus, they have a little reflective N logo for extra visibility.
On Cloudmonster
220 Triathlon verdict
A well-cushioned running shoe, just lacking for us on fit and comfort. Score: 80%
Pros
- Propulsive ride
- Lots of cushioning
Cons
- Sizing comes up small
- A little firm
- £160
With their distinctive look, the Cloudmonster features On’s biggest ever CloudTec cushioning for ‘massive cushioning and max energy’.
They take a bit of getting used to as, although they certainly have lots of cushioning, they still felt a bit firmer than some others.
Despite having only a 6mm drop, the rocker shape and powerful Speedboard provided good rebound and forward propulsion, and at 230g (UK7.5) they were one of the lighter trainers on test.
We felt the recycled upper was a little thin and they weren’t as fitted or comfortable as the rest. They were breathable, though, and the lining was nice and soft.
The sizing comes up a little small for us, so it might be worth going up half a size to allow for foot expansion on longer runs.
The On Cloudmonster certainly deserves praise for its propulsive ride and would be capable of delivering on both shorter and longer runs.
Asics Gel-Cumulus 24
220 Triathlon verdict
A comfortable, high-performing, all-round cushioned running shoe. Score: 88%
Pros
- Cushioned and responsive
- Comfortable everyday shoe
Cons
- None to add!
- £135
These trainers fit like a glove, the OrthoLite X-30 soft sock liner meaning you pop them on and forget about them, which for us is the sign of a great shoe.
We tested this zingy Oasis Green, but they have a strong range of colours if looks are important to you.
This latest version of the Gel-Cumulus has been updated with Asics FF Blast cushioning, which is purported to help create a softer landing and more responsive toe-off.
We found they had really good, squidgy cushioning, but crucially, they still managed to be responsive, with an 8mm drop and decent forward propulsion.
The Gel-Cumulus also feature gender-specific 3D Space Construction to ensure a good fit, while the upper mesh material is breathable and made from recycled material with reflective accents to help visibility in low light.
These are trainers you could wear all day, and they come with the versatility to suit different runners and distances.
If cushioned running shoes aren’t your thing, take a look at our list of:
- The best barefoot running shoes
- Best sustainable running shoes for 2025
- The best budget road running and trail running shoes for 2024