Best energy gels for running and triathlon in 2024
Energy gels are a vital part of every triathlete's training and racing kit. James Witts reviews the best
Energy gels, those small pockets of power, have become a staple in the triathlete’s larder. Where once their viscosity reached such extreme levels that it was like squeezing out the remnants of toothpaste and proved equally hard to swallow, nowadays the best energy gels have struck a palatable balance between fluid and solid.
That makes them ideal for running, where water might not be to hand, though, as you’ll see, many still benefit from a water chaser.
Below we have 17 different energy gels on test, but further down you’ll find a guide on how we tested and when you should take energy gels.
Best energy gels for running and triathlon in 2024
SiS Beta Fuel Gel
- £14/$14.99 for 6
Beta Fuel’s been around for a while, but only in powder form. The orange gel tested here is made of a newly developed blend of maltodextrin to fructose in a 1:08 ratio, which delivers a hefty 40g of carbs.
SiS’s studies identified this split as optimum, increasing the percentage of oxidised carbs from 62% to 74%. We can’t verify that without a lab, but the texture and taste is great, and it digests smoothly. Impressive.
220 Triathlon verdict
Cracking new gel from the energy behemoth that is SiS. Score: 87%
Pros
- High carb content
- Texture and taste is great
Cons
- Pricey
Aptonia Energy Gel
- £4.99 for 4
The first incarnation of this gel was face-achingly sweet, but, thankfully, the Decathlon-distributed brand has since dropped the butter and toned down the viscosity and sweetness to create a delicious burst of energy.
That burst is 23g of carbs (derived from a mix of glucose, fructose and maltodextrin) per 32g gel, which is impressive as, unlike its rivals here, it leaves little volume for water.
Despite that, it’s effortlessly consumed, but you might want to complement it with other gels the longer you train to avoid flavour fatigue, and, as always, test before racing.
It’s also loaded with vitamins B1, B6, B12, E and zinc, stated as 30% RDA for each, and is a fine price. Top stuff.
220 Triathlon verdict
Welcomed improvements and great value. Score: 86%
Pros
- Good value
- Added vitamins
Cons
- Easy to get flavour fatigue
Rawvelo Energy Gel
Buy now from Rawvelo
- £38.29 for 20 / $12.99 for 12
Rawvelo is a progressive sports nutrition company that does its bit for the environment as well as the athlete.
It’s a registered member of 1% For The Planet, which sees brands commit to donate 1% of annual sales revenue to address environmental challenges.
You can also post empty gel wrappers back to the company for recycling. In fact, that wrapper is the only downside in an otherwise good offering as it requires quite the dental wrestling match to rip open.
But once it is, you’re presented with a rather tasty blood orange flavour in an easy viscosity, so it flows down nice and easy.
The relatively liquid consistency is due to this 50g sachet containing just 20g carbs. That’s one of the lowest here. It’s not too much of a concern but it’s something to note when tallying up the calories per pence.
As you’d expect from an ethically sound company, the ingredients list is pretty healthy with standouts including rice syrup, coconut sugar and sea salt with natural flavouring.
220 Triathlon verdict
This is a tasty offering from the ethical foodies, but others deliver more carbs. Score: 80%
Pros
- Great eco-credentials
- Healthy ingredients list
Cons
- Low carb content
- Wrapper can be tricky to open on the move
Maurten Gel 100 Caf 100
Buy now from Maurten
- £38.95 / $50 for 12
Maurten’s USP is down to hydrogel, produced from alginate (from brown algae) and pectin (found in fruits).
The theory is that hydrogel shields the energy composition from the acidic environment of your stomach, which results in smoother transport of carbs to the intestine where the carbs are absorbed and assimilated into the bloodstream and sent off to working muscles.
Not only does this reduce gastro distress, say Maurten, but it ups the amount of carbs you can ingest each hour. Hence, one of the first products the brand launched comprised a whopping 80g of carbs.
This is a much smaller sugar hit, coming in at 25g per 40g sachet. We enjoyed its neutral taste but, more uniquely, its jelly-like texture, sitting halfway between an energy block and a traditional energy gel.
As for caffeine, 100mg is a strong enough hit to start stimulating potential ergogenic benefits. It’s nearly all good but you can’t ignore that heavy price.
220 Triathlon verdict
Unique gel with great texture that flows smoothly. Expensive, though. Score: 81%
Pros
- Solid carb content
- Neutral taste and jelly-like texture is appreciated
- Some swear by the hydrogel construction
Cons
- Painfully expensive at £3.25 per gel
Veloforte Desto
Buy now from Veloforte
- £24.19 / $33 for 12
We’re big fans of Veloforte’s range of energy bars that are packed with real fruit and nuts, but this is the first time we’ve tried a sachet from the gel range, in this case tart cherry and guarana.
Each gel contains 22g carbs from two sources – fructose and glucose – to aid absorption and assimilation. They’re housed within a compact 33g sachet, so very easy to stow.
The ingredients list is appreciatively minimalist: brown rice syrup, fruit juice concentrates, water, maple syrup, guarana extract and Himalayan salt.
The latter two provide 75mg caffeine and 110mg sodium respectively, contributing towards more power and hydration.
We also appreciate the lack of hyperbole and sensationalism as tart cherry’s shown to accelerate recovery. But not in the volume here.
Viscosity is low so, recommends Veloforte, you can also squirt its contents into 250ml of water, or two to a 500ml water bottle, for an energy drink. That’s fine but it’s nicer as a gel.
220 Triathlon verdict
Impressive gel that doesn’t overclaim and uses real ingredients. Score: 81%
Pros
- Small ingredients list made with real foods
- Handy boost of caffeine and sodium
Cons
- Low viscosity means you may need to mix with water
- Over £2 per gel, so not all that cheap
Styrkr Gel30 Dual-Carb Energy Gel
Buy now from Styrkr
- £24.99 for 12
We’ve tested a few products recently from nutrition outfit Styrkr (pronounced ‘stir-kuh’, meaning strength in Old Norse) and been impressed with the thoughtful additions, especially in the amino-acid department.
The drink enjoyed a hit of fatigue-boosting L-glutamine and this gel includes the amino acids L-arginine and L-citrulline.
There’s proof that, like beetroot, L-arginine delivers a nitric-oxide boost to improve endurance performance.
But there’s greater evidence that throwing in L-citrulline results in larger gains as it’s a precursor for L-arginine.
In essence, they’re an endurance tag team. Positively for age-groupers, this effect seems more pronounced than for elites.
That said, research focuses on the 6g figure for the ergogenic hit. Here, it’s 500mg of both, meaning you’d need to doff a fair few.
The amino acids make the taste a little synthetic. You’re looking at 30g from maltodextrin and fructose for carbs. The 60ml container highlights its middling texture.
220 Triathlon verdict
A solid product from the British brand, but it loses marks for taste. Score 78%
Pros
- Handy addition of amino acids
- Decent 30g carb content
Cons
- Taste is a little synthetic
High5 Energy Gel With Slow Release Carbs
- £24.49 for 14
High5 is known for stirring up credible products at good prices. These work out at around £1.75 each, which isn’t bad, but they’re also around 40p more expensive than a standard High5 gel. So why the price hike?
Firstly, is the addition of isomaltulose, which has a lower GI than glucose and is digested more slowly. This stream of sugar avoids blood spikes so you can sustain a higher effort for longer.
Without access to a lab that’s hard to assess, but we didn’t experience any stomach problems (23g per 62g sachet leaves plenty of room for water) or bonking.
The gel has also been enhanced with 70 ocean minerals for electrolyte top-up, albeit trace amounts. Still, it’s a credible addition.
220 Triathlon verdict
Goes down well but not the same value for money. Score: 79%
Pros
- No stomach problems
- Slower release of energy
Cons
- Pricier than standard options
OTE Lemon and Lime
- £39.90 for 20
The viscosity of this lemon and lime gel’s similar to High5, so flows smoothly.
It’s also rather tasty thanks to the fruit-juice concentrate, but thanks to the alchemy of food science, that concentrate features lemon and apple rather than lime.
Each 56g sachet comprises 20.5g of carbs via fructose and maltodextrin.
That’s the lowest on test, which raises the palatability stakes but lowers value for money as, if you’re aiming for a pretty standard 60g carbs per hour, you’ll need three of these (or £6).
Ease of use is OTE’s byword with two opening options – tear to sip or tear to gulp. Because of its fluid-like status, we always tend to gulp. That’s a personal thing, but worth noting.
220 Triathlon verdict
Does a decent job and will appeal to many. Score: 78%
Pros
- Tastes good
- Easy to consume
Cons
- Low carb content
SiS Go Isotonic
- £33 for 20 / $14.72 for 10
SiS’s product range has grown beyond recognition, but it’s the long-standing Go Gel that continues to eclipse it.
Like times gone by, the Go Gel delivers 22g of carbs per 60ml serving from maltodextrin with water filling out the remainder.
As High5 and OTE’s offerings showed, this easy-flowing composition’s standard these days. But ‘more experienced’ triathletes will remember gels of the past resembling toothpaste.
If you had no water chaser, your gums would cling together. SiS’s isotonic option changed all that.
As for taste, blackcurrant’s tasty and much nicer than the fruit-salad alternative that we’ve tested before. Value’s good, though you’ll need three per hour (£4.95).
220 Triathlon verdict
Some might call it dated, but we’d argue it stands the test of time. Score: 85%
Pros
- Good consistency
- Blackcurrent tastes decent
Cons
- Less carbs than others
Torq Performance Energy Gel
- £35.25 / $40 for 15
This new gel from Torq hit the textural sweetspot: not so loose that it flows like fluid, not so thick that it resembles tar.
Its consistency’s apt for its sweet caramel taste, and it’s really rather delicious. Though you might only want a couple per long session before delight turns to distress.
Carbs make up 28g (112kcals) per 45g serving from both maltodextrin and fructose sources.
This sugary blend’s been shown to absorb into the bloodstream via different intestinal pathways, helping to prevent gastro issues while raising the potential to consume greater quantities of carbs.
There’s an 89mg caffeine hit from guarana, and its compact shape fits neatly in your rear pockets on both the bike and run.
220 Triathlon verdict
Another impressive product from Torq. Score: 87%
Pros
- Caffeine hit
- Solid amount of carbs
Cons
- Pricier than some competitors
- Gets a bit sickly after a couple
High5 Electrolyte Energy Gel
- £28.99 for 20
High5’s forged a reputation for great value since they were founded by triathletes back in 1994.
Nearly 30 years in the volatile sports-nutrition business is impressive but understandable when this gel’s nearly £2 cheaper than the most expensive here.
Then again, it’s a more rudimentary composition than the Maurten, delivering 23g carbs from glucose and maltodextrin.
It flows down nicely, but is a little looser than we’d like; that said, this simply might be a perception thing as the SiS gel contains a similar ratio of sugar to sachet and felt a touch more viscous.
Of course, this is all subjective and arguably that greater fluid hit is appreciated on the run if you don’t have a drink to hand.
A sprinkling of sodium, magnesium, potassium and chloride is appreciated, as is High5’s recycling programme.
Buy a box and the UK company includes a pre-paid envelope so you can return your empty wrappers. It’s a great idea and one that should be commended.
220 Triathlon verdict
Good product, good price, superb eco USP. Score: 77%
Pros
- Recycling programme
- Good value
Cons
- Consistency may be too loose for some
- Bigger carb hits from other gels
Healthspan Elite Energy Gel + Caffeine
- £39.99 for 24
Several of the gels on test include caffeine and we can see why. It’s arguably the most studied ergogenic around, its mooted benefits including the ability to train harder by playing around with your brain’s neuro-receptors.
The majority of studies see improvements at around the 200-400mg level, which is why the 75mg in this 60g sachet should complement a caffeinated beverage hit pre-session.
We’d also time ingestion around 20-30mins before a hard section, like a hill, to maximise its effectiveness.
As for carb content, you’re looking at 24g (96kcals) via the proven 2:1 maltodextrin-fructose combo.
It’s easily consumed without water, explaining its fluid consistency, which does dilute the perceptive caffeine kick (and flavour) somewhat. Still, it’s ideal on a run.
220 Triathlon verdict
Does a decent, if not spectacular, job. Score: 76%
Pros
- Easy to consume
- Decent carb content
Cons
- Minimal caffeine hit
- Taste is middling for this tester
Applied Nutrition Velocity-Fuel Sprint Isotonic Energy Gel
- £25.95 for 20
This gel is both marketed as containing 23g carbs, which looks like it’s derived from maltodextrin, and zero sugar.
Technically, maltodextrin is extracted from starchy foods such as potato corn but, as the US Food and Drug Administration proclaimed in 2018, it still counts as a sugar as it’s created through controlled hydrolysis.
However it’s dressed up, it still leads to a spike in blood glucose, which is what you’re after in a gel, of course.
Zero sugar for triathletes is an electrolyte drink that’s shorn of carbs. It feels like the manufacturer’s trying to appeal to both markets with confusing results. It’s isotonic, there’s a 75mg caffeine hit, and the flavour is moderate.
220 Triathlon verdict
An affordable, but confusing, product. Score: 69%
Pros
- Decent value for money
- Reasonable carb hit
Cons
- Flavour is moderate
- Trying to do too much at once
Precision Fuel 30 Gel
- £33.71 / $45 for 15
Precision Fuel is the energy-delivering arm of Precision Fuel & Hydration, formerly known as Precision Hydration.
That maelstrom of monikers is down to the UK company recently expanding their range from solely electrolyte products to energy drinks, chews and gels. And if the latter’s anything to go by, we’re in for a nutritional treat.
First up, texture, which is thicker than your normal gel but pleasingly (thin) jelly-like rather than cloyingly toothpaste-like. Flavour’s neutral, which is appreciated, especially if it’s a long run and you’re complementing with other flavoured offerings.
Each 51g sachet – compact packaging means you can store many in your tri-suit – contains 30g carbohydrates from a classic 2:1 glucose-to-fructose ratio. And we appreciate the ‘30g carb’ stamp on the front to clearly monitor your fuelling intake.
Stuff Verdict
Impressive offering from the sultans of sodium. Score: 86%
Pros
- Impressive carb content
- Neutral flavour makes a nice change
- Pricier per gel, but higher carb content makes it good value
Cons
- Some may prefer a thinner consistency
Vala Energy Gel
- £23.65 for 10
Vala’s a new one to us and hails from Neath in South Wales. The name means ‘chosen’ as, according to the founders, “we want athletes to have a natural choice of gel that helps them to perform at their best”.
That ethos is reflected in the ingredients list, which comprises maple syrup, date paste, lemon juice, lime juice, chia seeds, matcha tea powder and sea salt.
There are no hidden preservatives in a 35g sachet that delivers 102kcals from 23.8g of carbs and a near-negligible amount of good fat. Which is all great on paper but what about texture and taste?
In short, fantastic. The texture resembles paste – not surprisingly when you look at the contents – while the taste leans heavily on the date side, too. It flows smoothly, and though a water-chaser helps it’s not essential, so is great on both the bike and run.
220 Triathlon verdict
Not cheap but worth the extra for a top natural gel. Score: 88%
Pros
- Natural ingredients and no hidden preservatives
- Great taste and texture
Cons
- Pricey at £2.37 per gel
- Consistency means water-chaser is useful
Nutrition X Energel + Caffeine
- £4.49 for 2
Nutrition X’s 50g gel serving sends 24g (96kcals) of carbs your way via maltodextrin and dextrose.
They’re transported into your bloodstream via the same intestinal transporter, though, so unlike partnering with fructose, theoretically you could consume fewer of these per hour than a gel like Precision Fuel’s.
Then again, the dynamic world of racing means textbook laboratory advice often doesn’t transcend to the real world.
You also wouldn’t want to overload on these thanks to the 80mg caffeine content. Added electrolytes come in the form of a modicum of sodium, magnesium and potassium.
The cola taste is fine, but we’d have appreciated even more of a cola kick, though the middling texture means you can get away with it on the final discipline without doffing water.
220 Triathlon verdict
Moderate gel; we would have liked a stronger cola taste. Score: 74%
Pros
- Reasonable carb content
- Caffeine boost
Cons
- Cola taste a little weak
- Middling texture
Mountain Fuel Sports Jelly
- £30 for 20
UK brand Mountain Fuel’s Sports Jelly has a similar texture to that of Maurten’s gels. When you delve deeper, you understand why because both companies utilise hydrogel technology.
The idea is that pectin encapsulates the multi-source carbohydrate – in Mountain Fuel’s case, maltodextrin and glucose – which purports to transport seamlessly through your inners to reduce the chances of gut distress.
Sceptics question the efficacy of this idea, but we’ve enjoyed Maurten’s products for a while and never had any stomach issues.
And we didn’t here, although their traditional Sports Jelly contains just 20g (80kcals) of carbs, among the lowest on test.
That said, the Sport Jelly+ option contains 30g. The orange taste is strong and the jelly’s refreshing enough that washing down with water’s not essential.
220 Triathlon verdict
Good texture and taste with an interesting USP. Score: 82%
Pros
- Hydrogel technology reduces risk of gastric distress
- Taste is refreshing
Cons
- Low carb content
How we tested the best energy gels
Every energy gel that’s been included here has been personally tested by author, sports science writer and former 220 Triathlon editor James Witts.
James puts each product through a handful of tests, using multiple samples, including consumption on the go to check how easy they are to open and if any gastric distress becomes noticeable.
Other metrics we rate the best energy gels on are taste, consistency, value for money, carb content, quality of ingredients, eco credentials and whether or not there are any additional bonuses such as caffeine or sodium.
When should you take energy gels?
Energy gels have become a staple in the triathlete’s larder, their culinary convenience meaning you can bike and run to your heart’s content loaded. But when exactly should you use these speed-and-stamina sachets?
It’s a broadly sweeping brush but they’re not really needed unless you’re exercising for over 90mins.
That’s based on your glycogen stores being at capacity through a healthy, energising daily nutrition plan, which highlights that supplements like these aren’t maximised unless you’re fuelling proficiently as the norm, not on occasions.
That means good-quality carbs, muscle-repairing and rebuilding protein, good fats, and vitamins and minerals.
How many gels should you consume on longer sessions or racing? The ideal is an individualised prescription or, more likely, through trial and error in training.
Start with around 50g of carbs an hour (about two gels) and slowly consume more if you can stomach it over time. More calories delays fatigue resulting in a PB.
- Energy gels versus energy bars: what’s the difference?
- Do bananas give athletes the same amount of energy as gels?
- Best energy bars rated and reviewed